RBK = CRP

20Nov07

Since the silly season for holiday shopping is just around the corner, I’m guessing that countless hockey fans have their favorite team’s new jersey on their wish list. Well, as one of the unfortunate few that already picked up the RBK Premiere (nice name for “replica”), here’s some words of advice. Unless you really dig the new colors or a new player on your team, don’t bother — it ain’t all it’s cracked up to me.

I suppose I should start with a disclaimer: I don’t have the budget to blow several hundred bucks on an authentic jersey, so I got a replica because of my Jeremy Roenick fanboy tendencies. Here’s a quick overview of just why the RBK jersey is a piece o’ CRP.

1) The design: How many out there actually LIKE the redesigns of their favorite team jerseys? From an unbiased aesthetic point of view, the only new jersey I like is the Caps jersey. Most of the Original Six stayed the same, so that’s not a reason to buy a new jersey — though, seriously, what’s up with reversing the Captain/Alternate position on the Red Wings jersey? Is that really necessary? Bottom line: most hockey fans, like myself, dislike the new designs and if you’re lucky enough to be on one of the teams with a design similar to the old one, there’s no need to buy it. Strike one.

2) The material: I’m sure the new RBK Premiere material simulates the weird stretchy fabric of the on-ice jerseys. You know, the jerseys you’ve seen tear in half during a fight. Well, if you like FEELING like you’re actually wearing a hockey jersey, you’re going to dislike this thin, flimsy, stretchy material on the replica, whatever it is. Perhaps in an alternate universe, this is some sort of fashion trend; in our universe, it just feels kinda funky and incapable of withstanding a load in the washer and/or dryer. Strike two.

3) Stitching, or lack thereof: I’d heard some gripes about how hardly any of the crests or lettering on the new jerseys are actually stitched. I was pleasantly surprised when I opened up my NHL.com shipping box and saw that the big Sharks crest on the front looked to be as high quality as any other replica jersey I’ve got (including old Sharks, Chicago, Team USA, and Tampa Bay). It’s stitched on and the actual crest is composed of threads, not a cheesy looking iron-on patch. Phew.

Well, then I take the damn thing out and the first thing I notice is the shoulder patches — or should I say, cheesy looking iron-on patch. Nice plasticy sheen to make it look like the damn thing could fall off after one trip to the washing machine. Feeling the interior of the jersey, it’s just confirmed my hunch — not a single stitch to hold the shoulder patches in place.

A few inches down, you get the arm numbering. Now, every single jersey I have — even the freakin’ ones that my beer league team plays in — has stitched on numbers. Why? Cause they don’t look like they’ll fall off when you wear the damn thing. Like the shoulder patches, the arm numbers are heat-transfered on, so they don’t really move with the fabric. In fact, the more pointy edges of the numbers (like the tip in the number 7) look like they might easily snag on something and peel right off.

Take everything I’ve just said and you can apply it to the numbering and name plate on the back. Not only does it feel cheap, it looks cheap — the letters and numbers all have that weird shiny feel that tells you it’s not quality material. Strike three, you’re out.

So there’s your buyer’s guide to new jerseys: they generally look bad, they feel crappy, and they aren’t put together all that well. My recommendation? Only buy a new jersey if:

1) You really, really, really, really like the new design.
2) There’s a new player on the team that you really like (like me).
3) You have waaaaaaaaaaaaaay too much money in your pocket.

If you’re on the fence, don’t do it. You’ll just take a close look at it and feel kinda irritated and bitter at the whole stupid notion of an “new and improved uniform system” (which, in layman’s terms, translates into “cash grab for greedy owners”).

If I have time over the holiday weekend, I’ll take some close-up pictures and post them on here, along with a comparison to some of the other jerseys I own, including the one I play in.

Oh, and a quick note on sizing: these new jerseys are definitely cut differently. I owned old ones in both medium and large; the medium was a little too small and the large was a little too big. A large of this new RBK jersey fits right inbetween the old medium and large, so basically, it’s a little smaller and a little tighter compared to the same size in the old cut.

Advertisements


6 Responses to “RBK = CRP”

  1. 1 Patrick C

    First, I’m still surprised you didn’t register at shop.nhl.com. Isn’t that the one thing that would get used more than the blender?

    I have the new jersy of the Sharks, and I think it looks great. Of course I bought the home dark jersey which looks very sharp. Granted I didn’t buy the replica. I’ve gotten compliments from non-hockey fans over how good the jersey looks.

    Its more comfortable than the older jersey (less “scratchiness”).

    sizing: 42 reg is my suit size, the jersey I got is a 50 and fits quite well, tad long on the sleeves though.

  2. 2 dave in Rocha

    First off, I have to say that along with the new Caps look, I really dig the new Bruins look. They did it right.

    Second, this is yet another reason why I subscribe to my sweater philosophy of never getting a new one with an active player on it. I look around in Buffalo and see tons of Briere, Drury, Peca and Hasek sweaters, and I thank god that that’s not me. Sure, there are some current players that are exceptions (I’m pretty sure that one would be safe getting Sakic or Sundin, and Yzerman was a good bet while he was playing), but they are few.

    For the record, I have an un-named original blue Sabres sweater. Current contenders for it are Ruff, Ramsey, Housley and Foligno. Or I might go with someone more famous, like Gord Donnelly or Dave Snuggerud. Any suggestions?

  3. 3 Joe

    The reasoning on changing the position of the C/A on Red Wings jerseys was forced by the new jerseys and how they fit the player. The old Wings jerseys had a much much bigger chest panel, on which the original logo sat, and there was plenty of room near the tip of the Wing for the C/A. Grab the back of a loose fitting shirt and pull it, and see how much fabric on your chest you lose. That’s what happened to the new Wing’s jerseys. They lost a lot of fabric on the front, and in conjunction with the fact that tip of the Wing logo reaches out into that area of the chest, there just wasn’t room there for the C/A. Rather than shrink the logo or move it off center (which would look dumb), they just moved the C/A over.

  4. 4 Michael

    Dave in Rocha,

    Go with Horton #2.

    Mr Chen,

    I agree with your assesment about buying those new jerseys. I am not buying one of those. But the most anoying question is when the noobs as what the number 250 is on the Penguins shoulder.

  5. 5 rick marnon, howell

    The jerseys aren’t that bad. I wouldn’t go out and buy them, but they’re liveable.

  6. 6 seth

    I just bought two of those premier jerseys in a large. I wear a 42 suit, but these jerseys are tight. Compared to my old no name beaters the sleeves are longer, but really narrow. When I put them on over my pads the sleeves have to stretch. I’ll try the XL, but have a feeling the tight sleeves will still be there.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: